> Should be, legally incorporated civil union, > and religiously married.
I believe that many of the people who are against gay "marriage" are against it in religious terms. Since the middle ages, marriage in most Christian realms was seen as a religious matter (never mind that marriage as an institution pre-dates any of the current major religions). They see homosexuality as wrong or immoral, so for a couple of that standing to come in and say they want right to "marry" is equivalent to an assult on the religion itself. Marriage in the present is more about the legal and civil benefits and consequences, so allowing and giving the same rights to "civil unions" isn't an unfair compromise, in my opinion. I'm not a religious person, so I personally don't care what it's called. I'd like to see the same rights and benefits extended to everyone who wants to get together (heterosexuals, homosexuals, polyamorous groups, whatever) regardless of what it's ultimately called by the state. -Justin ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:294549 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
