The median for non-emergency MRI was 2 weeks. Emergency situations would be immediate. Why are you so hung up on MRI's? You seem a little OCD with the whole imaging thing. I would bet that if you asked a group of Canadians if they would prefer:
a) MRI's in an hour but have to pay for insurance (which would fight tooth and nail to deny claims) or out of pocket and where medical procedures/supplies are double or triple the going rate and drugs that are up to 10 times more than going rate OR b) a free inclusive system where they wait two weeks to three months for a non-emergency MRI and immediate imaging for emergency situations unless they are millionaires or better the answer is going to be a resounding "B!!!!!" On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Actually I jumped in when Larry said a three month wait for an MRI or > a specialist was a good thing. > I just pointed out how silly that sounded :P > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Michael Grant<mgr...@modus.bz> wrote: > > > > Sam, you're all over the place in this thread mate. > > I'm not saying the US should adopt any other country's system. > > You are attacking the Canadian system with silly and unfounded "facts" > and > > I'm defending it. Try to follow along mate. > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:303041 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
