On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Bruce Sorge <sor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Other than that it would not have worked > with the terrorist who potentially could have blown up a plan on > Christmas day. > Yes, I know, I have no interest in trying to retrofit a procedure that would have found the explosives in this assholes underwear. The intelligence we had on this man should have had him on the "high risk flier" list...that should been the end of it. > Typical overreaction. > I actually think a full body scan is a typical overreaction. > What conveniences have been taken away other than having to remove your > shoes and belt? Removing shoes, can't take liquids, can't take this...can take that...can take 4 ounces of this, but not that....stupid. Retrofitting to detect threats that have already passed. > If you are talking about the random "sir, please step > aside for further scrutiny" part of this, then yes, I agree. Stop doing > that. My step father and I were both pulled aside flying from Tennessee > to California last year because we had one way tickets to California (we > drove my mom and grandmas vehicles to Tn while my mom lived there > temporarily for an assignment). Start profiling instead. I am all for that. > I'm 100% against profiling, unless a person shows up on a list of high risk fliers. Then cavity search 'em for all I care. -- We're baptized in these waters And in each others blood ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:309863 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
