>What is your opinion on the Gospel of Thomas? It doesn't seem to be >any later than the canonical gospels, yet represents a drastically >different way of viewing early Christianity.
I'm not familiar with that one. I know that there were several reasons that various gospels were rejected other than the one I sited, but I don't know all the reasons. Most of them were along the lines that would cause a professional fact checker to discard something, but as I said a few of them were more editorial choices. Thomas could have been in either category. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:322998 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
