Or how about we at least consider the idea that life is too complex to have occurred randomly? At its core that's all ID is. ID itself doesn't say snot about who the intelligent designer is. Just because fundamentalists latched onto it when they heard about it doesn't make it a Christian principle.
-----Original Message----- From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 11:33 AM To: cf-community Subject: Re: CFUnited Soundoff I'm all for lets keep religion out of science classes. If that is what you're referring to. Otherwise if we have to teach a creation myth in biology classes, lets go for a mythology that is more interesting. How about the Sumerian mythology - it has lots of kinky sex, incest, rape, and violence. That should keep the kids riveted to their seats. If you look at the empirical support behind the Sumerian mythos and the one put forth by the creatinists, there's not a whole lot of difference. The empirical support for both is essentially nil. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:323587 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
