Nope I disagree. The so called God in the Gaps concept has been discredited so often than its not even a valid argument anymore.
Given the other stuff you're mentioning you really need to read the Dover Case's judgment before commenting further. On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Sisk, Kris <ks...@gckschools.com> wrote: > > Or how about we at least consider the idea that life is too complex to > have occurred randomly? At its core that's all ID is. ID itself doesn't > say snot about who the intelligent designer is. Just because > fundamentalists latched onto it when they heard about it doesn't make it > a Christian principle. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 11:33 AM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: CFUnited Soundoff > > > I'm all for lets keep religion out of science classes. If that is what > you're referring to. > > Otherwise if we have to teach a creation myth in biology classes, lets > go for a mythology that is more interesting. How about the Sumerian > mythology - it has lots of kinky sex, incest, rape, and violence. That > should keep the kids riveted to their seats. > > If you look at the empirical support behind the Sumerian mythos and > the one put forth by the creatinists, there's not a whole lot of > difference. The empirical support for both is essentially nil. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:323594 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
