On 7/23/2010 9:38 AM, Sisk, Kris wrote:
> Or how about we at least consider the idea that life is too complex to
> have occurred randomly?

Which nobody here is saying one can not consider.  But *unless* you can 
express the idea in scientific terms, I.E. with a testable and 
falsifiable thesis including repeateable experiments it is not a 
scientific idea and such does not belong in a science class.   Until 
then it is a philosophical idea that belongs in philosophy or religion 
classes

Some here will jump and and debate the philosophy with you!  But I am 
confidant none will deride you for having the philosophy.  Just don't 
call it science by trying to redefine the rules of science.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:323593
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to