On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 6:49 PM, denstar <valliants...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah. Well that's fine. I think there are laws for such things, but > law is such a messed up area... And board of directors. > Don't get me wrong, we've got a pretty awesome system, but it could > still use a bit of work. =) Obviously > Oh. I thought we were talking about how alarming this NPR stuff is. > Seems like if it should "really alarm" me, calling it an emergency > isn't so funny. Is that you're doing? Playing with one word and making the whole point moot? > LOL! It was only so long ago that the thread hasn't split, so it's > just a matter of scrolling up, if you're in a threaded view. Well if he thinks it's so so much ado about so so little maybe an alarm bell would wake him up. > This proves the biased nature of NPR? You linked it to the state of > the news in the nation and Nazis... You wandered again. What links? Are you now claiming they aren't biased or that you like the bias? > Biased towards money, I guess you meant? I think they confessed that they thought conservatives were idiots or something like that. Elitist shit that seems to make you proud. You are Ivy League right? > My point was that there's probably lots of emails like this out there. > It's shady business, no doubt, but an EMERGENCY? And just for NPR? > Do you also believe that public broadcasting is vital to national > security? You sorta poo-pooed the idea when Gruss mentioned it, I > think. Again with they aren't guilty because others probably do it? Didn't you just mention laws and what not? >> Ah, so let's water it down until it passed off as the norm. > > That's not what I was aiming for, but is the opposite of that better? But it is. You're saying it's so so ado about so so nothing. > Is it *really* something to be *really* alarmed about? Call an > emergency session to pass a bill that's not aimed towards actions like > this in general, but NPR specifically? What? Did I ask for that? Isn't the budget an emergency and isn't that part of the budget? > Did I imagine you telling Gruss it should really alarm him? I was talking to Gruss who at the time was excusing it is much ado about so so... > pretty sure you used alarm a couple of times, and said how they love > them some terr'ists Yeah, I'm pretty sure accepting money from known terrorist organizations is illegal. > (forgetting for a moment the deal about being > scared to fly with folk on airplanes-- I know! /that's/ why they > fired that dude! Cuz they loves teh terrorz!). I'm not following that. Who? >> Did you lose your place again? Or, are you saying I should look away >> while you find things wrong with people I support? > It doesn't have to be either/or, you know. I'm more pointing out > perspective, or perhaps, a sense of proportion. We were talking about NPR taking and hiding money from terrorists. > Is this going to fix the budget? Go a long ways towards fixing the > budget? Is it /really/ alarming? Is this what we should be focused > on, right now? So you're saying we can't discuss anything unless you decide it's worthy enough? We were discussing. Take another hit and chill out:) > You say "yes, for real", I say "not so much". More power to you, > wanting to see justice served, but I don't think it justifies an > "emergency". I didn't even thing it was urgent enough to post, but when lies were bandied about I started adding my 2 cents. > I guess so, if you want to look at it that way. It's a more polarized > way of looking at it, I think, but it's basically valid, so what the > hell! Should I ask you next time before responding if a topic is worthy of commenting? Save us all this typing. >> I'm starting to find it hard to believe Obama's responsible for anything. > Responsibility is a weird deal. Whole philosophies are devoted to > sussing out its nature. Rush said: "if you choose not to decide you still have made a choice" so I guess voting present carries some responsibility. > Surely he plays a part, as do we all. No man is an island. ('cept > sorta, all men /are/ islands-- women too!) Are you going to go with his picks? > The whole "this is a big deal, be alarmed about X, and really alarmed > about Y (terrorists)" seemed sorta like it *was* you. Can I call you Harpo? > I haven't confused you with the GOP. =) They were cutting them anyway, this just gives them more ammo. > I'm sure all the gray hair is from the back nine. I hear it's a doozy! What's he done besides Obamacare which he didn't even do? > Do you want me to say he's an evil bastard because he's done what I > predicted he'd do, as far as giving power back to the people? I don't > know that it's his to give... I'm super glad Bush set so many awesome > examples for future presidents though! If you predicted the misery index for America to be this high and are glad you were correct than you suck. Just saying. > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzs8TPyv3QI I'm so glad I don't h ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:335306 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm