Actually that meta-analysis that Sam cited has nothing to do with the neuropsych of political beliefs.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I am on deadline and don't have time to play. But I know, shades of grey, > quite a concept, eh? > > History says that if I download this article I will find out that it > doesn't mention the article Larry posted. If it does say they calculated > it wrong -- and maybe that is what Larrry wants to look at -- then hey, > we have science at work here and we need to see who else can repeat one or > the otherl > > By the way, you were going to post a link about Firth paying some people > off, remember? > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> If you read the stupid blog you would have realized it's based on this: >> >> >> http://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=4MrZ9zMAAAAJ&citation_for_view=4MrZ9zMAAAAJ:u5HHmVD_uO8C >> >> Short link here >> http://www.edvul.com/voodoocorr.php >> >> It's was cited a couple more times then your peer reviewed infallible >> study. Because we all know that if it was peer reviewed it is perfect >> and there is no arguing with it's findings. >> >> I'm conflicted >> >> . >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > I detect a blog. A blog, Sam. No input validation at all, yanno? >> > Bzzzt. Still SAMMYDONTLIKE IT. >> > >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:347069 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
