It was written before the Rees study, so no. But it talks about the accuracy for those types of studies. Measuring that part of the brain.
"a disturbingly large, and quite prominent, segment of social neuroscience research is using seriously defective research methods and producing a profusion of numbers that should not be believed." So technically that Rees study could be perfect. . On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Dana <dana.tier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't actually think the Rees thing is that earth shaking. I mean my > life certainly hasn't changed. > > I have not looked at the Vul article because I am doing stuff but are > you actually saying that it critiques the Rees article in particular? > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:347077 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
