he wanders in and out. Was last seen comparing batshit AZ politicians to
batshit CA politicians.

On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Vivec <gel21...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Church should not have sway over individual rights.
>
> Some churches do not permit blood transfusions. Should people die as a
> result?
>
> Where health is concerned, what a church wants or does not want is
> immaterial. The person's health concerns take precedence.
>
> But discussing that may be another thread.
>
> Don't remember seeing you on the list before...Hi! *waves* :-)
>
> On 5 March 2012 16:22, j...@garzasixpack.com <j...@garzasixpack.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > No.  That's not what this debate is about.  The debate is about whether
> or
> > not the government can force a religious institution to do things that
> are
> > against the moral tenets of the religion.  In other words, is the first
> > amendment worth the parchment its written on?  This administration
> doesn't
> > think it is.
> >
> > You are correct that thus debate has been taken over by politics.  Like
> the
> > democrats holding a congressional hearing that to allow people like this
> > student to bring up points that have nothing to do with the original
> issue
> > of church vs state.
> >
> > Connected by DROID on Verizon Wireless
> >
> >
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:348000
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to