No. That's not what this debate is about. The debate is about whether or not the government can force a religious institution to do things that are against the moral tenets of the religion. In other words, is the first amendment worth the parchment its written on? This administration doesn't think it is.
You are correct that thus debate has been taken over by politics. Like the democrats holding a congressional hearing that to allow people like this student to bring up points that have nothing to do with the original issue of church vs state. Connected by DROID on Verizon Wireless -----Original message----- From: Vivec <gel21...@gmail.com> To: cf-community <cf-community@houseoffusion.com> Sent: Mon, Mar 5, 2012 19:45:16 GMT+00:00 Subject: Not accepting Rush's apology So I hear that the student says she does not accept the apology. Now that moves this squarely into the realm of politicking and a campaign to destroy Rush. That's not what the debate is supposed to be about at all, and by not accepting the apology she's now shifted the debate into the realm of pure politics. It's supposed to be about women's rights, reproductive rights, contraception etc. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:347994 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
