Yeah tell that to our mixed race child of a single mother president. So tell me the Eric, what are those limits at this point? Who enforces them?
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Eric Roberts < ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: > > Yeah..it's not codified, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. I > wouldn't > use anyone...there are still lots of limits to upward mobility in this > country. > > -----Original Message----- > From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 3:39 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: Zimmerman charged in Martin's death... > > > Whatever man, the aristocracy were the nobles, the ruling class. There > isn't any such thing codified in law in the U.S. Anyone can rise to any > station through their own merits. > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Eric Roberts < > ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: > > > > > Patrician certain fits... > > > > pa·tri·cian /pÉËtrɪÊÉn/ > > <http://dictionary.reference.com/help/luna/IPA_pron_key.html>Show > > Spelled[p > > uh-trish-uhn] > > <http://dictionary.reference.com/help/luna/Spell_pron_key.html>Show > > IPA noun 1. > > a person of noble <http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/noble> or > > high rank; aristocrat. > > 2. > > a person of very good background, education, and refinement. > > 3. > > a member of the original senatorial aristocracy in ancient Rome. > > 4. > > (under the later Roman and Byzantine empires) a title or dignity > > conferred by the emperor. > > 5. > > a member of a hereditary ruling class in certain medieval German, > > Swiss, and Italian free cities. > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:30 PM, LRS Scout <lrssc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > nobleman - patrician - noble? > > > > > > Miss that part? > > > > > > We have no aristocracy in America. > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Eric Roberts < > > > ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > They were very much the American aristocracy. They were rich > > > > white guys...most of whom inheritied it. Some earned it. Most > inherited. > > > > Besides, what of your definition denies that they weren't? They > > > > were members of the American aristocracy...making them aristocrats. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:21 PM, LRS Scout <lrssc...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *a·ris·to·crat*/ÉËristÉËkrat/Noun: > > > > > > > > > > 1. A member of the aristocracy: "an aristocrat by birth". > > > > > 2. Something believed to be the best of its kind: "the trout is > the > > > > > aristocrat of freshwater fish". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Synonyms: > > > > > nobleman - patrician - noble - peer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So no, they weren't. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Eric Roberts < > > > > > ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > keeping in mind that with all the nobility of most of thier > > actions, > > > > > these > > > > > > were all also artistocrats... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:15 PM, LRS Scout > > > > > > <lrssc...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, so whats the solution? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think Ron Paul or Gary Johnson, and I'm sure you would > > disagree, > > > > > right? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not that either of them will likely be on my ballot, so I > > > > > > > will > > > likely > > > > > > write > > > > > > > in a candidate. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Eric Roberts < > > > > > > > ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would agree with Maureen...if you are not part of the > > > > > solution...you > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > part of the problem... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Maureen < > > mamamaur...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And I repeat, even thought I am sure it is a waste of > > > > > > > > > time, > > > all > > > > of > > > > > > > > > those candidates have supporters and contributors in > > > > > > > > > your > > group > > > > of > > > > > > > > > "decent people". If they did not they would not have won > any > > > > > > > > > primaries or election. Not everyone who vote for a > > candidate > > > > does > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > because they don't like the opponent. Santorum, Romney > > > > > > > > > and > > > Obama > > > > > all > > > > > > > > > have rabid supporters. Are you denying that? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Jerry Barnes < > > > > > critic...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "All of those megalomaniacs have supporters, > > > > > > > > > > contributors > > and > > > > > > voters > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > your pool of decent people." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maureen, I don't know how I can explain it any clearer. > > I'll > > > > > try, > > > > > > > even > > > > > > > > > > though I am pretty sure it'll be a waste of time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let's take Rick Santorum. Many people voted for him > > because > > > he > > > > > was > > > > > > > NOT > > > > > > > > > > Mitt Romney. Now, that Romney has pretty much wrapped > > > > > > > > > > up > > the > > > > > > > > nomination, > > > > > > > > > > many people will vote for him because he is NOT Obama. > > They > > > > are > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > "supporters" in the traditional sense. They are > > > > > > > > > > choosing > > the > > > > > > lesser > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > two > > > > > > > > > > evils (in their opinion at le > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:350035 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
