<cfset var the = "this"> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:56 PM, LRS Scout <lrssc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah tell that to our mixed race child of a single mother president. > > So tell me the Eric, what are those limits at this point? Who enforces > them? > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Eric Roberts < > ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: > >> >> Yeah..it's not codified, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. I >> wouldn't >> use anyone...there are still lots of limits to upward mobility in this >> country. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 3:39 PM >> To: cf-community >> Subject: Re: Zimmerman charged in Martin's death... >> >> >> Whatever man, the aristocracy were the nobles, the ruling class. There >> isn't any such thing codified in law in the U.S. Anyone can rise to any >> station through their own merits. >> >> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Eric Roberts < >> ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: >> >> > >> > Patrician certain fits... >> > >> > pa·tri·cian /pÉËtrɪÊÉn/ >> > <http://dictionary.reference.com/help/luna/IPA_pron_key.html>Show >> > Spelled[p >> > uh-trish-uhn] >> > <http://dictionary.reference.com/help/luna/Spell_pron_key.html>Show >> > IPA noun 1. >> > a person of noble <http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/noble> or >> > high rank; aristocrat. >> > 2. >> > a person of very good background, education, and refinement. >> > 3. >> > a member of the original senatorial aristocracy in ancient Rome. >> > 4. >> > (under the later Roman and Byzantine empires) a title or dignity >> > conferred by the emperor. >> > 5. >> > a member of a hereditary ruling class in certain medieval German, >> > Swiss, and Italian free cities. >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:30 PM, LRS Scout <lrssc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > nobleman - patrician - noble? >> > > >> > > Miss that part? >> > > >> > > We have no aristocracy in America. >> > > >> > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Eric Roberts < >> > > ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > > >> > > > They were very much the American aristocracy. They were rich >> > > > white guys...most of whom inheritied it. Some earned it. Most >> inherited. >> > > > Besides, what of your definition denies that they weren't? They >> > > > were members of the American aristocracy...making them aristocrats. >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:21 PM, LRS Scout <lrssc...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > *a·ris·to·crat*/ÉËristÉËkrat/Noun: >> > > > > >> > > > > 1. A member of the aristocracy: "an aristocrat by birth". >> > > > > 2. Something believed to be the best of its kind: "the trout is >> the >> > > > > aristocrat of freshwater fish". >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Synonyms: >> > > > > nobleman - patrician - noble - peer >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > So no, they weren't. >> > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Eric Roberts < >> > > > > ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > keeping in mind that with all the nobility of most of thier >> > actions, >> > > > > these >> > > > > > were all also artistocrats... >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:15 PM, LRS Scout >> > > > > > <lrssc...@gmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Ok, so whats the solution? >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I think Ron Paul or Gary Johnson, and I'm sure you would >> > disagree, >> > > > > right? >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Not that either of them will likely be on my ballot, so I >> > > > > > > will >> > > likely >> > > > > > write >> > > > > > > in a candidate. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Eric Roberts < >> > > > > > > ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I would agree with Maureen...if you are not part of the >> > > > > solution...you >> > > > > > > are >> > > > > > > > part of the problem... >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Maureen < >> > mamamaur...@gmail.com> >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > And I repeat, even thought I am sure it is a waste of >> > > > > > > > > time, >> > > all >> > > > of >> > > > > > > > > those candidates have supporters and contributors in >> > > > > > > > > your >> > group >> > > > of >> > > > > > > > > "decent people". If they did not they would not have won >> any >> > > > > > > > > primaries or election. Not everyone who vote for a >> > candidate >> > > > does >> > > > > > so >> > > > > > > > > because they don't like the opponent. Santorum, Romney >> > > > > > > > > and >> > > Obama >> > > > > all >> > > > > > > > > have rabid supporters. Are you denying that? >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Jerry Barnes < >> > > > > critic...@gmail.com> >> > > > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > "All of those megalomaniacs have supporters, >> > > > > > > > > > contributors >> > and >> > > > > > voters >> > > > > > > > from >> > > > > > > > > > your pool of decent people." >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Maureen, I don't know how I can explain it any clearer. >> > I'll >> > > > > try, >> > > > > > > even >> > > > > > > > > > though I am pretty sure it'll be a waste of time. >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Let's take Rick Santorum. Many people voted for him >> > because >> > > he >> > > > > was >> > > > > > > NOT >> > > > > > > > > > Mitt Romney. Now, that Romney has pretty much wrapped >> > > > > > > > > > up >> > the >> > > > > > > > nomination, >> > > > > > > > > > many people will vote for him because he is NOT Obama. >> > They >> > > > are >> > > > > > not >> > > > > > > > > > "supporters" in the traditional sense. They are >> > > > > > > > > > choosing >> > the >> > > > > > lesser >> > > > > > > of >> > > > > > > > > two >> > > > > > > > > > evils (in their opinion at le >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:350036 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
