It's not my argument that says believe all or none. That's been what has been preached for ages.
It's definitely not my argument that the bible is the "Inerrant word of God" On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Well, if your talking about the gospels aren't there five, written > over decades by different people? > Yet your argument seems to be believe all or none? > > That's why I think it's a cheap shot at religion. I'm sure you can > find valid and specific arguments, but the broad brush get's my > attention. > > . > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox > <zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I still don't get how using specific examples from a book that is held up > > as the basis of a religion is an attack on said religion? > > > > Seems to me that if you're offended by things in that book, you're, in > > essence, offended by your own religion. > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:359512 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
