What you are claiming was an attack on religion was actually a somewhat tongue-in-cheek commentary on several passages of the Old Testament. It has nothing to do with the gospels. Perhaps I simply feel if you are going to attack what is posted, you should at least have some comprehension of what is being discussed. And I guess my second question would be why you feel the need to defend something if you aren't even invested in it enough to find out what it really is.
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Four or five, not important > > What's wrong with my time frame? > > No, I have not read them. > > What baffles me is that you think someone should be all in to defend > someone else. > > . > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Maureen <mamamaur...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Baffled that anyone would attempt to defend or discuss religion and not > > even know how many gospels there are, or when they were written. > > > > My next question would be have you read them? > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:359516 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
