>Actually, on day one they were given far more than 10% of the lands that >israel now occupies. they refused it.
But when you take out all the religious aspects of it....If you lived all your life in a farm or a house, and someone came over and told you this land was owned by our ancestors 2-3 thousand years ago, and its our promised land, you must leave, but we will let you settle in that 10, 20, 30 % over there....I mean realisticaly speaking, i myself would not have moved..... I didnt force there ancestors to leave, nor did i have anything to do with there struggle and the holocust, why should i be the one to suffer now....? again, that is why you should of moved them all out......would have been a no issue now, look at how many millions of people where forced out or relocated or even killed through out recent history, lets not even go past that.....does it bother anyone today that millions got killed in africa, or chechnia or bosnia or throughout Asia and central America....NO! DO people care about American Indians and what happened to them ? sadly, No... People forget and move on in history....it would have been a thing of the past... Beth F <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:... > No, from day one they should have accepted the existence of Israel, gotten > their own state on the other 10% of the mandate given to them and left well > enough alone. Either that or settled on the 80% of the mandate that is now > Jordan. Actually, on day one they were given far more than 10% of the lands that israel now occupies. they refused it. ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-community@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
