Dana Tierney wrote: >so... in your opinion mySQL would not be an improvement over Access >say?
Unless there are reasons why Access simply won't work (like you are running Linux). >1. A patient registry which while be almost entirely character data and >booleans. Some counters. Will be very low-traffic. I am using mySQL for >this. You should be able to run that on Access without a problem. >2. A patient system which should be scaleable and capable of being >modified >for fairly high security. Again, will handle primarily booleans and >character data, but must be able to accomodate medium to high traffic. How do you define high traffic? How many queries per second, and what is the insert/update/delete/select ratio? How complicated are the queries? Just retrieval based on the primary key, or complicated multi-table joins with functional predicates? Jochem ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Host with the leader in ColdFusion hosting. Voted #1 ColdFusion host by CF Developers. Offering shared and dedicated hosting options. www.cfxhosting.com/default.cfm?redirect=10481 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
