"Trollbait" and "Learn to Google"
:-)
Seriously, a "recently answered, check archives" kind of thing would
probably be good as well.
--BenD
Michael Dinowitz wrote:
> Now that I've got some (forced) free time, I'm going to do a few things:
> 1. finish up all the things on the subscription UI
> 2. Move all the lists into a central DB
> 3. clean up all the urls for a more unified and shorter look
> 4. Set up a way for people to set a thread as being important
>
> That last part is the one I wanted to talk about. Which sounds better,
> voting for a thread or having some higher level 'managers' set a thread as
> answered or important? What are the categories that you would like to see. I
> assume answered and important are the top 2, but what about OT (and does it
> apply here). Are there others that I should think about?
> Thanks
>
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
- Important threads Michael Dinowitz
- Re: Important threads Ben Doom
- Re: Important threads Michael Dinowitz
- RE: Important threads Dan Phillips
- Re: Important threads Jim Campbell
- RE: Important threads Jim Davis
- RE: Important threads Ian Skinner
- Re: Important threads Michael Dinowitz
- Re: Important threads Guy McDowell
- Re: Important threads Michael Dinowitz
- RE: Important threads Dan Phillips
- Re: Important threads Michael Dinowitz