On this list there are threads that are important in the realm of CF or
general. On the tech lists, the importance is based on the simple question
of usefulness. If it's a simple question but one that everyone asks, then
its important.
> I'm not sure that any thread is really more important than another on this
particular list. Maybe on this list have it go by popularity, then recency?
Just a thought.
>
> With the more technical forums, again how do you determine importance.
I've asked some comparatively dumb-a$$ questions, but to me they were
extremely important. What would importance impart to a particular thread?
>
> Maybe just sticking to the answered designation would be good. Beats me,
never run a list like this though.
>
>
>
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
- Important threads Michael Dinowitz
- Re: Important threads Ben Doom
- Re: Important threads Michael Dinowitz
- RE: Important threads Dan Phillips
- Re: Important threads Jim Campbell
- RE: Important threads Jim Davis
- RE: Important threads Ian Skinner
- Re: Important threads Michael Dinowitz
- Re: Important threads Guy McDowell
- RE: Important threads Michael Dinowitz
- RE: Important threads Dan Phillips
- Re: Important threads Michael Dinowitz
- RE: Important threads Dan Phillips
- Re: Important threads Kevin Graeme
- Re: Important threads Michael Dinowitz
- RE: Important threads Andre Turrettini
- Re: Important threads Michael Dinowitz