> ok... so when it comes to performance, it's better to use > strutctures than > arrays and both of those are better than lists. i thought lists were always fastest. is this not true? when did this happen? mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
- Re: List wierdness ... again Birgit Pauli-Haack
- (Admin) Re: List wierdness ... again Michael Dinowitz
- Re: (Admin) Re: List wierdness ... aga... Birgit Pauli-Haack
- Re: (Admin) Re: List wierdness ... aga... Michael Dinowitz
- Re: (Admin) Re: List wierdness ... aga... Michael Dinowitz
- RE: (Admin) Re: List wierdness ... aga... Gary McNeel, Jr.
- Re: (Admin) Re: List wierdness ... aga... Michael Dinowitz
- Re: (Admin) Re: List wierdness ... aga... Brett Payne-Rhodes
- Re: Another question on performance paul smith
- RE: Another question on performance Kevin Langevin
- Re: Another question on performance --... Mike Amburn
- Re: Another question on performance --... Seth Petry-Johnson
- RE: Another question on performance --... Chris Evans
- RE: Another question on performance --... Mike Amburn
- RE: Another question on performance --... Nick Slay
- SQL Stored Proc Question Nick Slay
- Scheduling Pages and CFSCHEDULE Nick Slay
- RE: Scheduling Pages and CFSCHEDULE Adrian Cesana
- RE: Another question on performance --... Nick Slay
- Oracle odbc setup Simha R. Magal
- RE: shipping costs Steve Pierce