> My point is that if you do not like it do not use it. > There is no need for certain persons to chime in every > time a Fusebox discussion is taking place to present > the opposing view. Who are opponents saving and from > whom?
Considering that the discussion thread is entitled "Cons to Fusebox", who would you expect to chime in? I think it's a bit presumptuous of you to decide who should participate and who shouldn't. As for who's being saved, who are you saving by stating your opinions? > I do not advocate Fusebox; I don't really try to > defend it. I do try to answer questions and pass along > information based on my experience using Fusebox on a > daily basis. I feel it is more accurate than someone > who tired it... Once... A couple of years ago (or the > like). We must have different definitions for "advocacy" and "defense". I think that your statements clearly fall within the definitions for both. Again, as I stated earlier, I don't think there's anything wrong with that. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
