Yeah -- all MS servers (IIS 7.5).
Is that a problem?
--
Cheers!
Michael David
------ Original Message ------
From: "Matt Quackenbush" <quackfu...@gmail.com>
To: "cf-talk" <cf-talk@houseoffusion.com>
Sent: 8/20/2012 9:23:36 AM
Subject: Re: CF10 vs Railo
>On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Michael David <
>li...@michaeldavid.com
>>wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>>So -- the new CF licensing policy has me thinking....
>>
>>Anyone out there using Railo in a a high volume production environment?
>> Using beefy hardware, I have been able to avoid the need to cluster so
>>far. So, how is Railo's performance?
>>
>>
>
>
>
>Unless you're doing something like a lot of Microsoft or PDF integration,
>Railo will obliterate ACF in performance. Every time. All the time.
>Period. You'll need wwwwwwwwwwwwaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyy less hardware
>with Railo.
>
>
>
>
>>
>>The thing I need most is dependability. I don't just have time to
>>babysit temperamental installs. Is Railo rock-solid?
>>
>>
>
>
>
>Hell yes.
>
>
>
>
>>
>>And what about security?
>>
>>
>
>
>
>Not sure what exactly you're getting at, but Railo is at least as "secure"
>as ACF. In just a basic installation, I'd venture to say that Railo is more
>secure, as each Railo instance provides sandboxing out of the box, giving a
>"Web Administrator" to each project/application. But to really answer your
>question, we'd need a much more detailed question (or series of questions).
>
>
>
>
>>
>>How is its cfscript implementation? I am on a mission to avoid tags to
>>the extent possible, except when rendering html.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>Railo's cfscript implementation beats the hell out of ACF's, and has for
>years.
>
>Go run this on ACF. Then install Railo and give it a whirl. :-)
>
><cfscript>
> foo = {
> x:'yay!',
> y:'hooray!',
> z:'rock on, Railo!'
> }
> writeDump( foo )
></cfscript>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>I checked out Railo's unsupported tags and functions, and only
>>cfspreadsheet is a problem, but I see that there is
>>an extension out there. I often have the need to output data into
>>multiple sheets within one file...
>>
>>
>
>
>
>I don't do much with cfspreadsheet, so I don't know if that's a deal
>breaker or not. I can say that the extension has done what I needed and
>done it well the handful of times I've needed that functionality.
>
><opinion>
>
>Bottom line. The future of CFML *is* Railo.
>
></opinion>
>
>HTH!
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:352215
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
