Interesting that you picked only that argument. :-) That example is more than just semi-colons, and is a very small sampling of how and why cfscript in Railo beats the hell out of cfscript in ACF. You know it as well as I do, although I can appreciate your reasoning for needing to defend ACF. :-)
<cfscript> foo = myService[ myMethod ]( argumentCollection: arguments ) </cfscript> There's another perfect example of how cfscript in ACF blows. Something that should have (and could have) been supported for years, but Adobe intentionally chose not to support it. Again, I appreciate your need to defend ACF. And your right to do so. I, too, was once a staunch supporter of ACF. Things change. :-) On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Raymond Camden <raymondcam...@gmail.com>wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Matt Quackenbush <quackfu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Railo's cfscript implementation beats the hell out of ACF's, and has for > > years. > > > > Go run this on ACF. Then install Railo and give it a whirl. :-) > > > > <cfscript> > > foo = { > > x:'yay!', > > y:'hooray!', > > z:'rock on, Railo!' > > } > > writeDump( foo ) > > </cfscript> > > Um - it works fine in ColdFusion if you add semicolons. Are you > seriously arguing Railo beats the "hell" out of ColdFusion because you > can leave off semicolons? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:352220 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm