On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Matt Quackenbush <quackfu...@gmail.com> wrote: > know it as well as I do, although I can appreciate your reasoning for
Actually I don't. It was an honest question. If semicolons are the only thing holding you back from being successful, then you probably have other problems! (And by 'you' I mean generically, not picking on you in particular.) I'd honestly like to hear more about why (which I see you did below). > needing to defend ACF. :-) > > <cfscript> > foo = myService[ myMethod ]( argumentCollection: arguments ) > </cfscript> > > There's another perfect example of how cfscript in ACF blows. Something > that should have (and could have) been supported for years, but Adobe > intentionally chose not to support it. I like that syntax. But your seriously saying script support 'blows' because it doesn't support that (and actually, you can do this, just with a different syntax). We will have to agree to disagree. I don't think it's fair to say ColdFusion's script support is crap because it doesn't support a few things - especially missing semicolons. Anyway - just my (and your) opinion. > Again, I appreciate your need to defend ACF. And your right to do so. I, > too, was once a staunch supporter of ACF. Things change. :-) It's not so much I need to defend ColdFusion, I just think your argument (your initial one) was incredibly weak. Then again - semicolons seem to be somewhat of a big deal these days for reasons I'll never fathom. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:352221 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm