To use WDDX, you have to be grabbing a WDDX packet from a server that is
generating it. You can use SoXML to parse XML from any source.
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Holloway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 1:47 PM
Subject: WDDX vs. SOXML
>
> I'm having a hard time figuring out what the motivation is for going
> over to the SOXML architecture (or something similar) versus using WDDX.
> I've done some very simple benchmarking comparing the two as follows:
>
> 1) Given a CF Object, encode it (CF2XML vs. CF2WDDX)
>
> 2) Deserialize it/parse it and display node values (XML2DOM vs. WDDX2CF)
>
> I've found wddx methods to be about twice as fast. I'm using the latest
> MSXML parser (4.0). My impression was that the MSXML parser would
> perform better that the <cfwddx> tags. Given that this is not the case,
> I trying to determine what is gained by going to a custom DTD as opposed
> to sticking with WDDX. Any insights to this would be greatly
> appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Bill
>
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
