Of course they aren't. However, I don't MS should be the standard that MM uses to measure themselves against. If it's true J2EE, it should be portable across all J2EE platforms. Of course, you'll notice that they in the initial public Neo info that they are only supporting a limited set of J2EE engines (interestingly enough, all of them are commercial products - even though there are a number of open-source J2EE products that are fully compliant). I doubt that CF6 will be true J2EE, which is rather unfortunate. I've never gotten a straight answer as to how they can support things like CFObject yet still be compliant. Sun sued (and won) Microsoft for bastardizing the Java spec. Hmm.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Neil Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:09 AM Subject: RE: Macromedia.com > "On a side note - I've heard that MM will "support .NET" - how > on earth can you be a true J2EE engine but still have support for the .NET > CLR?)" > > Oh and Microsoft are always true to specifications? :-) > > ______________________________________________________________________ Why Share? Dedicated Win 2000 Server · PIII 800 / 256 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / 20 GB MO/XFER Instant Activation · $99/Month · Free Setup http://www.pennyhost.com/redirect.cfm?adcode=coldfusionc FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
