I guess what I was suggesting was that MX *be* the form. Then u can extend your editing capabilities to wireless so management folks can update their site from their blackberry/pocket pc. ;)
Stace -----Original Message----- From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2002 12:04 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Content Management > What about a MX solution for rich editor? I saw an example > of one, was kick ass! (sorry don't remember site) Flash MX you mean? ... I haven't seen any ... I'm not averse to considering one ... though I'm inclined to suspect that it may be difficult to integrate into Tapestry due to its dynamic form structure ... i.e. the flash component isn't a part of the form, so ... it'd have to update a hidden field in the form any time changes were made I suppose ... dunno... I'd have to look into it... thanks for the suggestion. Isaac www.turnkey.to 954-776-0046 ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists