I guess what I was suggesting was that MX *be* the form. Then u can extend
your editing capabilities to wireless so management folks can update their
site from their blackberry/pocket pc. ;)

Stace

-----Original Message-----
From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2002 12:04 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Content Management

> What about a MX solution for rich editor? I saw an example
> of one, was kick ass! (sorry don't remember site)

Flash MX you mean? ... I haven't seen any ... I'm not averse to considering
one ... though I'm inclined to suspect that it may be difficult to integrate
into Tapestry due to its dynamic form structure ... i.e. the flash component
isn't a part of the form, so ... it'd have to update a hidden field in the
form any time changes were made I suppose ... dunno... I'd have to look into
it... thanks for the suggestion.

Isaac

www.turnkey.to
954-776-0046


______________________________________________________________________
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to