Let's call it møøse!!! Oh wait, that one is taken already.
How about døtCGI!!! Nope, no good. How about Cøtølyst!!! This is tougher than I thought :) Seriously though, I think a cool name would be a good thing. But I generally come up with really crap names so I will leave it to others :-/ As long as the name CGI::Application continues to work, as there is a huge amount of mindshare there already with the existing userbase. A new name will really only appeal to new users and PHBs. Cheers, Cees On 7/6/06, Joel Gwynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
True. One should also consider google-ability. Web::Application could be as difficult to google as .NET. On 7/6/06, Gabor Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Say aloud: So let's use Web::Application to build a web application. > Very confusing. > > IMHO this is a bad choice for name. > > Gabor > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/cgiapp@lists.erlbaum.net/ > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2 > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/cgiapp@lists.erlbaum.net/ http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/cgiapp@lists.erlbaum.net/ http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
