Re: [Chevelle-List] 200R4 trans

[R Milkiewicz]

Yes, but the one from a Buick T Type may be better. Rich ----- Original Message ----- From: Kyle Bennett To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 3:48 PM Subject: Re: [Chevelle-List] 200R4 trans Ok...i'm still a little confused.   So the 2004-R is from the Buick Grand National and it's the best to get. Is that right?   kyle bennett raleigh, nc      ----- Original Message ----- From: R Milkiewicz To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 2:43 PM Subject: Re: [Chevelle-List] 200R4 trans It is the same Clint. The correct designation though is 200-4R. Rich ----- Original Message ----- From: Clint Hooper To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 11:50 AM Subject: Re: [Chevelle-List] 200R4 trans Thanks for the info on the two transmissions,Rich. I thought a 200-4R was the same thing as a 200R4. Clint Hooper LT5 Registry Director '91 ZR-1 Callaway Aerobody http://www.LT5Registry.net/ '69 El Camino ProTourer  ACES #1650 http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint_hooper.htm '99 Honda F6 Valkyrie custom for sale ----- Original Message ----- From: R Milkiewicz   Larry, that's not entirely true. I guess if your going to have over 300 hp you might want to strenghten a couple of parts. The drum is one. It should be heat treated at the spline area or it has a tendency to wipe out. The last 3 years of the 200-4-R this part was heat treated across the board. It was originally done for Opel then GM decided to go across the board. It's a very good transmission and it was built with a dual bolt bellhousing. It will fit any GM car. Now the 200, that's another story. Remember, this trans (2004-R) was in the Buick Grand National, and that was turbo charged. The best one to get if you can find one is from a Buick T type. These are very tough. It's what I plan to use. I was going to go with a 700R4 but talking to some engineers at work they convinced me the 200-4R is better. JM2C Rich