Justin, Yes I tried that and it did work, but I think shaping is the preferred method for us.
Thanks, Dan. On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Justin Shore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm surprised that no one has mentioned using a simple Committed Access Rate > (CAR). It may not be the new hotness but it's simple, it works and works > just about everywhere. > > interface Vlan XYZ > rate-limit input 10000000 xxxx yyyy conform-action transmit exceed-action > drop > rate-limit output 10000000 xxxx yyyy conform-action transmit exceed-action > drop > > I never can remember the formula for burst-normal and burst-max and I can't > check it easily since I'm using a phone. That may work for you though. CAR > is simple and works but it's not as elegant or feature-rich as its more > complicated class-based kin. > > Justin > > > > Dan Letkeman wrote: > > > That's kind of what I thought. I will be able to move it over to the > > FE port soon. > > > > So on the config for the shaping command, I create the class, match > > anything, create the policy, assign the class, and enter the shape > > command: > > > > bandwidth 10M > > shape peak 13M > > (this should not allow any more bandwidth than 13M through?) > > > > and then on the interface enter in bandwidth 10M > > > > Sound right? > > > > Thanks, > > Dan. > > > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > The ports on the HWIC-4ESW (as well as on the other other switch modules > > > for the ISRs) generally don't support the same set of QoS features as > > > the "regular" L3 interfaces, so you can't shape on these ports. Can you > > > move your uplink to one of the built-in FE ports instead? > > > > > > oli > > > > > > Dan Letkeman <> wrote on Friday, April 25, 2008 2:37 AM: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Luan, > > > > > > > > I have tried this, but it doesn't seem to take effect. My connection > > > > is on an HWIC-4ESW. Could that be a problem? If I use "police cir > > > > 10000000" it works and seems to take effect. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Dan. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Luan Nguyen > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I would say you need to use CBWFQ for this. > > > >> Create an ACL match everything or whatever interested you out of > your > > > >> network and assigned to a class-map, then create a policy map > > > >> policy-map out > > > >> class out > > > >> bandwidth 10M > > > >> shape peak 13M > > > >> interface WAN > > > >> service out out > > > >> > > > >> -lmn > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Dan Letkeman > > > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> Bizarre response..... It just so happens that it's a shared > > > >>> connection and there is more than 10 available now, and will be > > > >>> getting 20+ in the future. > > > >>> > > > >>> :) > > > >>> > > > >>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Adam Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Dan Letkeman wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> Hello, > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> We have changed our internet connection over from 4 dsl lines to > > > >>>>> one connection. We have a 25mbit connection provided by a > > > >>>>> neighboring company and we have an agreement with them that we > > > >>>>> will only use 10mbit bursting to 12 or 13mbit. What would I need > > > >>>>> to do on our 2801 to limit our bandwidth to 10 bursting to 13? > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> What a bizarre arrangement! If you had just taken 10mbit you > > > >>>> could have just done "speed 10" :) > > > >>>> > > > >>>> adam. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > > >>> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > > >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > > >>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
