Mike,
The below article by our research director might be of use to you:

"Wireless LANs come of age" -
http://www.tbg.com/Promo/Articles/BCR_3_2000.htm

Irwin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Linehan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 4:53 PM
> To: Dale Holmes; CiscoStudyGroup
> Subject: Re: Wireless LANS
> 
> 
> Dale,
> 
> I think the premise of the argument I am to make is to create 
> a lively "debate" type of
> atmosphere. Think about it, if I get up and do a boring (or 
> semi lively even)
> presentation on the pros/cons of Wireless, and do a good job 
> at it, is it really going
> to be that exciting! I would have to have the presentation 
> skills of Laura Chappell to
> pull that off :) BUT if I make an insane argument (and the 
> more I delve into it the more
> insane it seems) it will garner lively discussion and 
> possibly a better learning
> atmosphere. At least this is what I hope.
> 
> Everyone,
> 
> Thank you for responding to this question, I will let 
> everyone know how I did, the
> presentation is next Thursday.
> 
> Mike Linehan
> 
> Dale Holmes wrote:
> 
> > How about "Anyone who makes the argument today that any 
> single technology is
> > appropriate for everyone is stupid!"???
> >
> > Wireless is cool, and has many applications, but not 
> everybody needs it.
> > There are many situations where it would be impractical or simply
> > inappropriate.
> >
> > I know it is all in good fun, but I am not sure that it 
> benefits anybody to
> > have NPA members practice justifying claims that are simply 
> ludicrous. Why
> > not investigate the top 5 most unexpected wireless success 
> scenarios, or
> > something like that, if you simply want to get people 
> excited about learning
> > new technologies?
> >
> > Sorry for the overwhelming negativity, but it *is* Monday...
> >
> > Dale
> > [=`)
> >
> > >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Subject: RE: Wireless LANS
> > >Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:33:33 -0800
> > >
> > >At 11:56 AM 10/30/00, Stanfield Hilman B (Brad) CONT NNSY wrote:
> > >>Three words...
> > >>
> > >>SECURITY - SECURITY - SECURITY
> > >
> > >Three words:
> > >
> > >ENCRYPTION, ENCRYPTION, ENCRYPTION &;-)
> > >
> > >How many of us use encryption on wired LANs? Probably not many. But
> > >everyone seems to use encryption on wireless LANs, at least 802.11
> > >wireless, which is what I'm familiar with... So that seems like an
> > >advantage, not a disadvantage.
> > >
> > >The disadvantages I can think of for wireless are:
> > >
> > >1. It's pretty slow (< 11 Mbps shared bandwidth)
> > >2. Mobile wireless is fraught with issues. How do you get 
> a new IP address
> > >when you move from subnet to subnet? (Of course, that's not too
> > >straightforward on wired either, come to think of it.)
> > >
> > >Priscilla
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> >>************************************************************
> ************
> > >>Brad Stanfield
> > >>Network/Integration Engineer
> > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>Government Micro Resources
> > >>  Network Operations Control Center
> > >>Norfolk Naval Shipyard
> > >>Bldg 33 NAVSEA NCOE
> > >>757-393-9526
> > >>1-800-626-6622
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>-----Original Message-----
> > >>From: Michael Linehan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >>Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 10:32 AM
> > >>To: CiscoStudyGroup
> > >>Subject: OT: Wireless LANS
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>As a member of the local chapter of the NPA  (Network Professional
> > >>Association) I have been tasked with an interesting 
> assignment. I need
> > >>to make the following argument:
> > >>
> > >>Anyone who uses a wired network today is stupid! or 
> Anyone who doesn't
> > >>use a wireless LAN is stupid! (take your pick)
> > >>
> > >>This is of course all in fun. I of course want to do as 
> good a job as
> > >>possible so my question is this.....
> > >>
> > >>If you had to make the argument that wireless is the only 
> way to go for
> > >>local area networking what would you say??
> > >>
> > >>_________________________________
> > >>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > >>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >________________________
> > >
> > >Priscilla Oppenheimer
> > >http://www.priscilla.com
> > >
> > >_________________________________
> > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > 
> ______________________________________________________________
> ___________
> > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at 
http://www.hotmail.com.
>
> Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> http://profiles.msn.com.
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Irwin Lazar.vcf

Reply via email to