which is what I thought until I read: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/103/eigrp4.html the first example has 3 routers with: router eigrp 1000 network 10.1.0.0 0.0.255.255 Kevin Wigle ********** Hi! EIGRP also as IGRP does not allow you to use 'OSPF-like' syntax for network-area advertisements. The router's IOS is right and points you to your fail. For future command syntax please refer to http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/np1_r /1rprt1/1reigrp.htm#xtocid820596 -- WBW, xander Cisco Consultant CCNP+Voice, CCIE Lab 19-20/04/2001 > In the lab again looking at a scenario. > > At first, I configured a transit link with a /24 mask. > > Later I thought - gee that's going to be a /29 or /30 in real life so I went > to change it. > > However, the router wouldn't accept "network 200.1.1.0 0.0.0.7" under > "router eigrp 10". It fails with the caret pointing at the first zero in > the wildcard mask. > > doing a "?" after "network 200.1.1.0" just comes up with a <cr>. > > However, on CCO I see examples of both statements - some with the mask > others without. > > Has the behavior of EIGRP changed lately even so that CCO has conflicting > examples or am I missing some connection? > > All routers have ip classless and ip subnet-zero configured. > > By the way, my lab scenario has OSPF redistributing the EIGRP. Looking at an > upstream routing table it shows the EIGRP network as a /29 even though there > is no "mask" in the statement. > > So what am I missing? > > Kevin Wigle > > > _________________________________ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
