great! too bad the example didn't use a network mask! :-) and it would be nice to know what is the changed functionality/behavior associated with using the mask as opposed to not stating it as before? Kevin Wigle ----- Original Message ----- From: "Erick B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "xndr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, 12 December, 2000 23:22 Subject: Re: EIGRP > Kevin and group, > > Here is the answer. > > 10.0 - EIGRP network command introduced > 12.0(4)T - The network-mask argument was added > > Here's the URL - watch the wrap. > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ip_r /iprprt2/1rdeigrp.htm#xtocid1405116 > > --- xndr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi! > > > > EIGRP also as IGRP does not allow you to use > > 'OSPF-like' syntax for > > network-area advertisements. > > The router's IOS is right and points you to your > > fail. > > > > For future command syntax please refer to > > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/np1_r > > /1rprt1/1reigrp.htm#xtocid820596 > > > > -- > > WBW, xander > > Cisco Consultant > > CCNP+Voice, CCIE Lab 19-20/04/2001 > > > > > > > In the lab again looking at a scenario. > > > > > > At first, I configured a transit link with a /24 > > mask. > > > > > > Later I thought - gee that's going to be a /29 or > > /30 in real life so I > > went > > > to change it. > > > > > > However, the router wouldn't accept "network > > 200.1.1.0 0.0.0.7" under > > > "router eigrp 10". It fails with the caret > > pointing at the first zero in > > > the wildcard mask. > > > > > > doing a "?" after "network 200.1.1.0" just comes > > up with a <cr>. > > > > > > However, on CCO I see examples of both statements > > - some with the mask > > > others without. > > > > > > Has the behavior of EIGRP changed lately even so > > that CCO has conflicting > > > examples or am I missing some connection? > > > > > > All routers have ip classless and ip subnet-zero > > configured. > > > > > > By the way, my lab scenario has OSPF > > redistributing the EIGRP. Looking at > > an > > > upstream routing table it shows the EIGRP network > > as a /29 even though > > there > > > is no "mask" in the statement. > > > > > > So what am I missing? > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. > http://shopping.yahoo.com/ > > _________________________________ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
