""John Hardman"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
92dofu$av3$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:92dofu$av3$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Humm... interesting question.
>
> From one point of view...
>
> What should be tested (or not tested):
>
> In over 10 years of IT work I have only ran across AppleTalk once, so drop
> AppleTalk (which they are doing).
>
> In the same time frame I have only ran across one IPX network that wasn't
> either in the process of being converted to 100BaseT or was only being
used
> in the DC to connect to a Novell server that was a file server which had
> it's drives mapped to NT drives. So IPX should take a big back seat to IP.
>
That's a pretty cool trick. Tell me how to convert my IPX network to
100BaseT and how I map my Novell server's drive to NT drives. WOW!
My $.02
Scott McClure, MCNE, CCDA, CCNP, (+Written)
> TR, well personally I like it, but again I have only seen one network with
> TR that wasn't planned to be changed to 100BaseT. Come to think of it,
they
> announced the upgrade a couple of months after I left there. So TR should
> also be in the back seat.
>
> Bridging, humm... well in some respects it is rarely used in the networks
I
> have seen, mostly to get to SNA servers. But then again you had better
know
> your IRB pretty well with all of the L3 switching that companies are being
> sold these days.
>
> L3 switching, better know that pretty well. There are just too many
> companies being sold L3 that it had better take a bigger role in the lab.
>
> The R/S written and lab should take on more of the service provider
element.
> I am not saying that the new SP track should be rolled into the RS track.
> But with outsourcing and the Internet with VPN, dial and the like taking a
> bigger and bigger role in most companies, better know your ATM, dial, VPN,
> BGP, etc, etc. The same can be said for security.
>
> Not having taken the lab, I can not really say as to how IPX, TR, or
> bridging is tested. It could be that it is tested as a primary thing and
not
> as a secondary, e.g. "well looks like we are going to have to deal with
that
> TR segment over rather we want to or not". The same could be said for ATM,
> maybe it should be a primary and not a secondary.
>
> Well there is $0.02 from one point of view, HTH.
> --
> John Hardman CCNP MCSE+I
>
>
> ""Chuck Larrieu"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> 002c01c0703c$c2ef8680$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:002c01c0703c$c2ef8680$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > We've all seen a number of comments about the CCIE written and the CCIE
> Lab,
> > regarding content. Most of those comments have been negative.
> >
> > So, what SHOULD be tested? What SHOULD a CCIE know?
> >
> > Anyone?
> >
> > Chuck
> > ----------------------
> > I am Locutus, a CCIE Lab Proctor. Xx_Brain_dumps_xX are futile. Your
life
> as
> > it has been is over ( if you hope to pass ) From this time forward, you
> will
> > study US!
> > ( apologies to the folks at Star Trek TNG )
> >
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
