Yes it is. The 172.16.4.255 ip address would be the 172.16.4.252 subnet
broadcast address though.
----- Original Message -----
From: Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 6:41 PM
Subject: Re: Ip addressing question
> Ok, so subnet zero is not usable, I understand that.
> Is the last subnet usable even though it contains the 255 portion of the
> address?
>
> >What subnets to we get from this combo?...
> >First subnet= 172.16.4.4
> >Second subnet= 172.16.4.8
> >Third subnet= 172.16.4.12
> >...
> >Last subnet= 172.16.4.252
>
>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
