Roger,
I assume your talking about the 7200 OSR? (announced officially
on Feb. 20th)
I'll admit that I haven't worked with the 7200 OSR, or with any of
Junipers routers for that matter, but what is the basis for your
comment that it "performs and scales better than Junipers routers"?
Is this from personal experience or have you seen a head-to-head
comparison by a trusted 3rd party? Same question goes for the
comment about the performance loss. According to Juniper,
they're architecture is such that they don't experience loss even at
high loads.
Again, I haven't worked with Juniper but I know folks who have and
they haven't told me about the sort of problem you describe.
Are your comments from personal experience or is this "Cisco
says..."?
-Kent
--- Roger Sohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, that's not true anymore. Cisco released
> their OC192 routers
> about 3-4 weeks ago and it performs and scales
> better than Juniper's
> routers.
>
> Juniper's equipment doesn't scale well and
> performance loss is experienced
> under a full loaded node of interface cards.
> Cisco's stuff doesn't do this
> and because of their independent architecture and
> design, everything runs at
> a carrier class level whether it has just one card
> or 8.
>
> Juniper was first to come out with the fastest
> backbone routers, but because
> Cisco retains the carrier class reliability,
> performance, and
> scalability...that's why it took them a bit longer.
> I guess it's worth the
> wait.
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
