Stefan
That is what I thought too. After reading the same book and
documentation on CCO, I thought that I was safe as long as the VTP
revision numbers were zero on both. I wonder if the IOS version numbers
have any effect!
Stefan Dozier wrote:
>
> Gareth Hinton wrote:
> >
> > Yeah that was sort of what I was getting at.
> > It would be nice if you could put the switches into a learning
> > mode, where
> > all server mode switches learn from all other server mode
> > switches
> > initially, but that's not the case, so one of them will decide
> > it's got the
> > highest VTP version and all others VLAN info will be wiped out.
> > I can't remember what the negotiation process consists of when
> > both versions
> > are zero, or if I ever knew. It's not an ideal way of doing it
> > anyway.
> > Probably easier to cut/paste vlan info on to one switch and
> > make sure it's
> > got the highest version.
> >
> > I've got a few sites with multiple 5500's in one VTP domain and
> > they're all
> > set to Server mode. Never caused any problems I can think of.
> > Off to get another book out to find out which switch wins when
> > both are
> > version zero.
> >
> > Gaz
>
> Quoting from the Cisco Press BCMSC book , chap 3 page 112....
>
> Two databases with the same configuration number will not update each
other,
> because they assume that they both have the same information.
>
> Stefan
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11402&t=11335
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
