That job looks like it sucks anyway...................
sam sneed
""Eric Rogers"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I was just cruising on the dice jobs board when something caught my
> attention.
>
> dice.com/DandL/k/ktii.213.html (paste into your browser)
>
>
> This is the first time that I've personally seen a recruiter target a
number
> range for a CCIE job!!!
>
> My question aloud is this -
>
> With the impending CCIE #10,XXX coming by next year are we going to find
> that there is going to be the perception that the higher your number the
> less value to the customer/employer/client.
>
> Of course, the headhunter/manager will never even comprehend that the CCIE
> made today has a much broader range to cover as say the CCIE of 3 to 5
years
> ago. NO, I NOT BASHING ANYONE JUST STATING A FACT.. :-)
>
> DAMN! I knew I should not have procrastinated for the past year before
> stepping up to the lab. I can just hear it now.
>
> Me: "Yes, I'm CCIE #xyz"
>
> Headhunter: "Thank you, but we're looking for a CCIE from block #abc"
>
> I hope this does not become the quid pro quo among
> managers/headhuters/recruiter or this could be a bad sign for the CCIE in
> the long run.
>
>
> Just MY percecption I guess!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19306&t=19296
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]