If that were true someone would go on a shooting rampage. I'll bet that if
you let your cert lapse and then recert at a later time you probably get
your old number back. Just a hunch, someone know better.
Don
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wright, Jeremy"
To:
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:20 PM
Subject: RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19296]
> My question is, what happens if a CCIE loses his number do to not
> recertifying? For example, if CCIE# 4000 doesn't recertify, is that number
> eligible for new CCIE's since it is now open. So if I get my CCIE tomorrow
> and 4000 didn't recert, is his number available to me?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glenn Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE
> cert??? [7:19296]
>
> While I agree that such an arbitrary distinction has the
> potential to be
> abused, this person is likely looking (hoping) for some
> heightened level of
> assurance that candidates will have many, many years of
> experience. I don't
> know enough CCIEs to comment on the validity of such an
> assumption regarding
> the correlation/magnitude of relevant experience with a
> given CCIE number.
> However, my guess is that simply by virtue of having such a
> low number that
> quite a few of the "early CCIEs" are now firmly entrenched
> in the upper
> ranks of management (and thus possibly, but not necessarily,
> out of touch
> with current technology in the field) -- but that assumption
> could be quite
> flawed.
>
> Worst case scenario -- give the recruiter your number in
> HEX, maybe they
> will be unable to convert it properly :-)
> (just kidding of course)
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of
> Eric Rogers
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: OT: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE
> cert??? [7:19296]
>
>
> I was just cruising on the dice jobs board when something
> caught my
> attention.
>
> dice.com/DandL/k/ktii.213.html (paste into your browser)
>
>
> This is the first time that I've personally seen a recruiter
> target a number
> range for a CCIE job!!!
>
> My question aloud is this -
>
> With the impending CCIE #10,XXX coming by next year are we
> going to find
> that there is going to be the perception that the higher
> your number the
> less value to the customer/employer/client.
>
> Of course, the headhunter/manager will never even comprehend
> that the CCIE
> made today has a much broader range to cover as say the CCIE
> of 3 to 5 years
> ago. NO, I NOT BASHING ANYONE JUST STATING A FACT.. :-)
>
> DAMN! I knew I should not have procrastinated for the past
> year before
> stepping up to the lab. I can just hear it now.
>
> Me: "Yes, I'm CCIE #xyz"
>
> Headhunter: "Thank you, but we're looking for a CCIE from
> block #abc"
>
> I hope this does not become the quid pro quo among
> managers/headhuters/recruiter or this could be a bad sign
> for the CCIE in
> the long run.
>
>
> Just MY percecption I guess!
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19322&t=19296
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
