I would use CB-WFQ, over all the others because of the control you can create.
Protrity queuing will "starve" out the other protocols if one is given priority over the others and it is busy. Frame-relay Fragmentation (FRF.12) is an interleave and traffic shaping comand, and as such will minimize seialization, but not prioritize. I would use it, but in concert with WFQ. Steve Ridder wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I accidentally deleted the original post - ah well. > We have a similar problem here - which we are hoping to solve by moving the > unix box to where the users are :-) > However I assume you have users at the central site who are using it as > well. > > I suspect that your overall proportion of telnet traffic is probably pretty > low, so you could probably implement priority queueing to give your telnet > traffic absolute priority with very little risk of locking out other > traffic. > However, it could just be that telnet packets are getting queued behind > large ftp packets and getting hit by a large latency - priority queueing > won't cause a telnet packet to preempt a large packet already on the wire > (which is probably just as well). > If priority queueing doesn't fix the problem, perhaps you should look at > some of the QoS techniques used to minimise latency for voice? For > example, frame relay fragmentation? > > JMcL (attempting to put into practice - even if vicariously - a voice > course done recently ;-) > > > ----- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 02/11/2001 02:25 pm ----- > > > "Michael > Williams" To: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Prioritizing > Protocols???? > Sent by: > [7:24959] > > nobody@groups > > tudy.com > > > > 02/11/2001 > 06:56 > am > > Please > respond > to > > "Michael > > Williams" > > > > > > > I agree with the other posters here. Let us know what those 1601 support. > Priority queuing with work, but Weighted-Fair (which should, as the other > poster said, handle this already) is the best choice for this. > Weighted-Fair is setup in a way the high bandwidth traffic doesn't choke > small bandwidth applications (like Telnet). Otherwise Priority or Custom > queueing are your only other options..... (AFAIK) > > Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=25100&t=24959 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
