At 05:45 PM 1/14/02, Fraasch James wrote: >I ran into a problem this weekend. I have a 7204 on one end and an IBM 6611 >on the other of a point to point T-1. IBM requires PPP encapsulation. I >debugged and got the following: > >*Jan 12 02:57:19.231: IP: s=172.25.137.201 (local), d=224.0.0.5 (Serial3/7), >len > 64, sending broad/multicast
Are you doing bridging? I know the IBM 6611 can act as a bridge. A router wouldn't normally even attempt to forward this packet addressed to a multicast address. It seems like you must be running OSPF in addition to bridging, though. That's the multicast address used for OSPF Hellos. I think you'll have to send us your config and some information about the logical topology to get to the bottom of this. Priscilla >*Jan 12 02:57:19.231: Se3/7 PPP: Outbound ip packet dropped, line protocol >not u >p >*Jan 12 02:57:19.231: IP: s=172.25.137.201 (local), d=224.0.0.5 (Serial3/7), >len > 64, encapsulation failed >*Jan 12 02:57:19.347: LSP-TUNNEL-TIMER: timer fired for Tunnel Head Checkup > >I know one of those lines says that the line protocol is not up but I >guarantee that it is. We were switching out an existing router that used >that line just fine. > >The Cisco Tech I talked to wanted to talk about reversing the bits and >seeing what that does. That's crap. It looks to be just an ARP problem but >I can fix it. Has anyone other there ran into this problem before, and if >so, how did it get fixed? > >This is my first post. Please dont leave me hanging. ________________________ Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31921&t=31916 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
