thanks, Cil.

I guess we can lay this one to rest.  the network in question probably needs
make no changes and life will be dandy.

Chuck

""Priscilla Oppenheimer""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Yes, I can use that DNS server that you mentioned without any problem. I
> have my PC set to use it right now. And I know of others that anyone can
> use too, but I'm not going to give details in case they would not like
this
> info to get out. ;-)
>
> Priscilla
>
> At 03:24 PM 2/18/02, Chuck wrote:
> >the simple way to test this would be to set your workstation with some
other
> >ISP's DNS address, and see how things go. In one of my posts I provided
the
> >real IP of an active DNS server. Someone want to give it a try? or post
one
> >that you know about. I'll be happy to test.
> >
> >I wish the guy who posted the original question would get back to us with
> >his results.
> >
> >Chuck
> >
> >""Priscilla Oppenheimer""  wrote in message
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > At 12:28 PM 2/18/02, Marc Thach Xuan Ky wrote:
> > > >Any decent ISP will refuse DNS recursion from any IP address that is
not
> > > >within its own address space.
> > >
> > > He wasn't asking about recursion. He was asking about the initial
query
> > > from the end host. Although I could believe you that a service
provider
> > > should make sure these queries only come from customers, my experience
is
> > > that service providers don't do this. I can set my PC to use a variety
of
> > > DNS servers around the Internet and it works.
> > >
> > > I think it's because it's tricky to do, especially for small ISPs.
Some
> > > ISPs might have only one DNS server. The same server that provides DNS
> > > services to Internet-access customers may also be the authority for
> >various
> > > names managed by the ISP. The ISP may be doing Web hosting and be the
> > > authority for a bunch of names. In that case, it can't filter out DNS
> > > queries coming from the Internet.
> > >
> > > For example, say your PC asks your local DNS server to resolve
> > > www.priscilla.com. Your server can't do it. It asks its upstream
server,
> > > probably one of the root servers. The root server figures out that
> > > petiteisp.com owns www.priscilla.com and tells your server the IP
address
> > > of the authoritative name server at petiteisp.com. Your server queries
> > > petiteisp.com which gives your server the IP address for
> >www.priscilla.com.
> > > Your server finally responds to your PC.
> > >
> > > Notice that the query to petiteisp.com came from some unexpected IP
> >address
> > > that can't be anticipated in a filter. If petiteisp.com had a filter
to
> > > allow queries only from its customers, the query from your server
would
> > > have failed.
> > >
> > > Did that make sense? ;-) How to bigger ISPs handle this? I suppose
bigger
> > > ISPs have more than one DNS server, one for Internet access customers,
> and
> > > one that is the authority for names owned by the ISP.
> > >
> > > Priscilla
> > >
> > > >  This is fundamental to DNS security.
> > > >You need to rewrite the destination IP address.  Note that Cisco's
NAT
> > > >is not suitable for this because of the DNS ALG.  The easiest thing
to
> > > >do may be to provide an on-site cacheing DNS using the old ISPs DNS
> > > >addresses.  If you've got a lot of workstations and a decent
bandwidth
> > > >to the Internet, you will probably find that running your own DNS
cache
> > > >will be more satisfactory anyway.
> > > >rgds
> > > >Marc TXK
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Godswill HO wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > You can still use your former ISP's DNS records while using the
new
> >ISP's
> > > > > bandwidth. It does not matter who owns the DNS server. Everybody
have
> > > >access
> > > > > to it once they are in the internet. Except when they are
> specifically
> > > > > filtered.
> > > > >
> > > > > The only drawn back is that, Your new ISP have to forward the
packet
> >in a
> > > > > round trip to the old ISP's network through the internet before
they
> >are
> > > > > resolved and sent back to you machine, had it been you are using
the
> >DNS
> > > of
> > > > > your new ISP, these request would stop there. Do not loose your
> sleep,
> > > > > because at the worst these delays are in milisseconds and not
easily
> > > > > noticeable by the eye, more each machine have a cache so it does
not
> > > >forward
> > > > > every request. Great if you have a Cache Engine to compliment the
> > > machine's
> > > > > cache.
> > > > >
> > > > > Whatever, you are kool and everything will be fine, switch to your
> new
> > > ISP
> > > > > and enjoy.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards.
> > > > > Oletu
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: Michael Hair
> > > > > To:
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 8:07 PM
> > > > > Subject: DNS Request Redirection [7:35703]
> > > > >
> > > > > > I was wondering what is the best way to take care of the
following:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have been using a private address space behind a Cisco 4500
> router
> > > > > > connected up to our current ISP using NAT, now we want to move
our
> > > > > > connection from our current ISP to a new ISP with better
bandwidth.
> >My
> > > > > > problem is that we don't want to change all our client machines
> >TCP/IP
> > > > > > settings, which are all static, for some reason or another they
> were
> > > all
> > > > > > setup to use our ISP's DNS. Not my idea but that another
problem.
> So
> > > how
> > > > > can
> > > > > > I setup our router to forward requests looking from our current
> >ISP's
> > > DNS
> > > > > to
> > > > > > our new ISP's DNS without touching all the client machines.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Would the best way be to use policy-base routing?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Would a static route work?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Could I use a static route under NAT?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If someone could proved me a sample of how you could do this I
> would
> >be
> > > > > > greatful...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > Michael
> > > > > _________________________________________________________
> > > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > ________________________
> > >
> > > Priscilla Oppenheimer
> > > http://www.priscilla.com
> ________________________
>
> Priscilla Oppenheimer
> http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35778&t=35703
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to