Perhaps it would be more appropriate to put your lab date instead of the "CCIE Written" if you want to demonstrate where you are in your pursuit...for example.
CCIE R/S LAB 6-1-2002 RTP ""Tim Booth"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Certainly that was conceptually clear. I think this is probably an > issue of semantics, but either way, I believe there is an exception to > be made due to the fact that this is a cisco study list. Where you are > in your studies could have some bearing on the immediate level of detail > in responses one gets, because it indicates the level of detail you > would desire. I really don't think that it is inappropriate to indicate > where you are in your cisco studies on a cisco mailing group. > > I, like you, would not agree to putting "MCSE Win2k Pro and Server" on > a cisco email list, but being appropriately detailed should be ok. I > believe that the difference between a CCNP, CCDP, or CCIP and someone > who takes the IE written is great enough to warrant such a distinction. > I know I learned a lot between my DP and my IE written. I like to be > thorough, and answering as many pertinent questions as possible in one > email, be it stated or unstated, is appropriate. > > As far as dealing with semantics, it is possible to restructure the > appendage, but why would that truly be necessary. If you think about it, > the best shorthand for someone who passed the CCIE written would be > "CCIE written." If it is to be suggested that I can't use CCIE in a > phrase simply because it *by itself* represents something different than > what I'm implying, that would be a little silly. > > I'm not trying to get a job with this title, or pretend to be > something I'm not; just indicating where I'm at. > > Kind Regards, > Tim Booth > MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP, CCIE written > ----------------------------------------- > Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary > safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. > Benjamin Franklin, 1759 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Solar > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 7:47 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: HELP !! CCIE 2B or NOT? [7:36542] > > Have no clear idea of why the CCIE Written should be dropped. Unless you > pass both written and lab exams, then append the CCIE after your name > > Compare it to the following > "Name" > CCNA, CCNP Routing Switching, BSc 3rd year, CCIE Written, MCSE Win2K Pro > and > Server, MBA 1st semester > > Is it conceptually clear to you ? > > Thank you Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36719&t=36542 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
