Australia uses "european-format" time as well? --
RFC 1149 Compliant. wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > However if you do this I suggest you use a less ambiguous date format - my > first reaction is "oh, so you did the lab in January - but did you pass??" > > JMcL > ----- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 28/02/2002 10:57 am ----- > > > "Jeff Buehler" > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 28/02/2002 09:29 am > Please respond to "Jeff Buehler" > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: > Subject: Re: HELP !! CCIE 2B or NOT? [7:36542] > > > Perhaps it would be more appropriate to put your lab date instead of the > "CCIE Written" if you want to demonstrate where you are in your > pursuit...for example. > > CCIE R/S LAB 6-1-2002 RTP > > ""Tim Booth"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Certainly that was conceptually clear. I think this is probably an > > issue of semantics, but either way, I believe there is an exception to > > be made due to the fact that this is a cisco study list. Where you are > > in your studies could have some bearing on the immediate level of detail > > in responses one gets, because it indicates the level of detail you > > would desire. I really don't think that it is inappropriate to indicate > > where you are in your cisco studies on a cisco mailing group. > > > > I, like you, would not agree to putting "MCSE Win2k Pro and Server" on > > a cisco email list, but being appropriately detailed should be ok. I > > believe that the difference between a CCNP, CCDP, or CCIP and someone > > who takes the IE written is great enough to warrant such a distinction. > > I know I learned a lot between my DP and my IE written. I like to be > > thorough, and answering as many pertinent questions as possible in one > > email, be it stated or unstated, is appropriate. > > > > As far as dealing with semantics, it is possible to restructure the > > appendage, but why would that truly be necessary. If you think about it, > > the best shorthand for someone who passed the CCIE written would be > > "CCIE written." If it is to be suggested that I can't use CCIE in a > > phrase simply because it *by itself* represents something different than > > what I'm implying, that would be a little silly. > > > > I'm not trying to get a job with this title, or pretend to be > > something I'm not; just indicating where I'm at. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Tim Booth > > MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP, CCIE written > > ----------------------------------------- > > Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary > > safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. > > Benjamin Franklin, 1759 > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > > Solar > > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 7:47 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: HELP !! CCIE 2B or NOT? [7:36542] > > > > Have no clear idea of why the CCIE Written should be dropped. Unless you > > pass both written and lab exams, then append the CCIE after your name > > > > Compare it to the following > > "Name" > > CCNA, CCNP Routing Switching, BSc 3rd year, CCIE Written, MCSE Win2K Pro > > and > > Server, MBA 1st semester > > > > Is it conceptually clear to you ? > > > > Thank you Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36755&t=36542 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
