Wayne, Why not use the router to terminate the links, and put the PIX behind the router? The PIX will inspect the traffic, and the router can send traffic to different links depending on where it originated from. Usually a 515 may be a better solution because it has a DMZ interface where the server can sit on, but I guess there is a cost concern.
Alex Wayne Jang wrote: > > Hi, > > The Pix don't route, but can I do this? > > I have a 2 server 20 user small office. > > I have a Pix 506 sitting in front of a 2621 with a T1 and a DSL > link to the > Internet. I'm not looking to load balance or even do > redundancy. I just > want traffic from the servers to use the T1 and I want traffic > from the > users to use DSL. I could use access-lists on the 2621 to > direct the > traffic based on source address, but how will the 2621 know > where the > traffic came from? Won't all traffic have a source address of > the Pix > outside interface? What if I Nat the servers(on PIx) so that > they will > appear to have a different source IP than the users who will be > behind the > global outside address? I'll need more public addresses, but > that would be > fine. > > I can't get any help from Cisco Pre-Sales because they aren't > sure. I can't > get an engineer that knows more than me (not much). > > My fall back plan is to only use the 2621 and have a firewall > IOS. But I > would rather use the Pix, especially because we have already > quoted the > above solution and are working to save face. > > Thanks > > -- > Wayne Jang > Advanced Computer Technologies, Inc. > 108 Main Street > Norwalk, CT 06851 > Wk 203-847-9433 > Cell 203-943-6603 > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46358&t=46356 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
