The RADware appliance looks cool, but this guy is done spending money. ""Greene, Patrick"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Wayne, > You have to put the PIX behind the router, as the PIX does not have T1 > interfaces...just LAN interface. UNFORTUNATELY.....AND I REALLY HATE TO > SAY THIS....BUT...this sounds like a good application for RADware's > LinkProof. You would plug your router and DSL into this device and it > will select the best route for traffic...granted you will get > assymnetrical traffic patterns with this...but it will do what you are > looking for...then put the PIX behind the LinkProof box. > > FYI...I am not slamming RADware but I try to make Cisco solutions fit > first when applicable and I compete a lot against other RADware > products. > > Sincerely, > Patrick J Greene > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Wayne Jang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 1:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Pix don't route [7:46356] > > > Hi, > > The Pix don't route, but can I do this? > > I have a 2 server 20 user small office. > > I have a Pix 506 sitting in front of a 2621 with a T1 and a DSL link to > the Internet. I'm not looking to load balance or even do redundancy. I > just want traffic from the servers to use the T1 and I want traffic from > the users to use DSL. I could use access-lists on the 2621 to direct > the traffic based on source address, but how will the 2621 know where > the traffic came from? Won't all traffic have a source address of the > Pix outside interface? What if I Nat the servers(on PIx) so that they > will appear to have a different source IP than the users who will be > behind the global outside address? I'll need more public addresses, but > that would be fine. > > I can't get any help from Cisco Pre-Sales because they aren't sure. I > can't get an engineer that knows more than me (not much). > > My fall back plan is to only use the 2621 and have a firewall IOS. But > I would rather use the Pix, especially because we have already quoted > the above solution and are working to save face. > > Thanks > > -- > Wayne Jang > Advanced Computer Technologies, Inc. > 108 Main Street > Norwalk, CT 06851 > Wk 203-847-9433 > Cell 203-943-6603
Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46386&t=46356 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
