""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > At 7:11 PM +0000 9/30/02, nrf wrote: > >""Robert Edmonds"" wrote in message > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > >> In a large organization, I would recommend OSPF anyway. It's generally > >> considered to be more scalable the EIGRP. > > > >Well, shyeeet, if you REALLY want scalability in an IGP, then there's only > >one answer - ISIS. > > > > When did you start trying to talk Texan? Shee-yit is generally preferred. > "-)
CL: in today's sensative geopolitical environment, one must take care not to mispronounce either, and end up talking about a partcular religious flavor made famous by cetain events in a certain part of the world a couple of decades ago. Just remember to keep that last vowel short, rather than long ;-> > > ISIS is certainly more scalable in a stable, flat topology. OSPF has > different scalability capabilities, admittedly more characteristic of > enterprises, but also potentially of POPs. > > Today's OSPF has more capabilities for hot potato routing, selective > flooding, etc. ISIS is being extended (e.g., L1L2 routers) to do some > of these things, although certain aspects of both may go into MPLS. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54573&t=54507 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
