I've never heard efficiency as a reason to use PPP over HDLC. there are more options with PPP, but otherwise both are based upon SDLC and therefore nearly identical from a protocol perspective. I suppose HDLC are a couple bytes smaller, but this would be negligable.
I'd say if your PPP is configured and working fine, why bother to go through the motions of changing for a 0.1% benefit? scott ""Stuart Pittwood"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > It has been mooted to me that we might get better performance from our > 1Mb line by using HDLC rather than PPP. > > > > Is this correct? > > > > If so is it just a case of changing the Encapsulation PPP to > Encapsulation HDLC on both ends of the link? > > > > Are there any implications I should be aware of? > > > > Thanks > > > > _________________________ > > Stuart Pittwood, MCSE > > IT Technician > > Amery-Parkes Solicitors Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64365&t=64362 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
