I should also have mentioned that the "B" is typically capitalized along
side the "K" when dealing with kilobytes (KB) and the "b" is typically not
capitalized when dealing with kilobits (kbps).  That's probably at least, if
not more, significant than the "K/k" capitalization (if, in fact, any of it
is significant).  I mention it because it seems to cause so much confusion. 
You won't see it around here much, but at some other forums one of the chief
complaints relates to achieving only 1/8th the expected download rate. 
What's happening, of course, is that the download is being measured in
KB/sec while the connection is rated in kbits/sec.  I'll shut up now...


s vermill wrote:
> 
> Amar KHELIFI wrote:
> > 
> > since
> > 1byte=8bits
> > and
> > 1Kbits=1024bits
> > then
> >  32kbps=32768bps=4096bytes
> > there is no formula.
> 
> Amar KHELIFI,
> 
> 1kbits does not = 1024bits and 32kbps does not = 32768bps. 
> 1kbps = 1,000bps & 32kbps = 32000bps.  "k" simply means 1,000. 
> The whole idea of 1KB (KiloByte) = 1024 bits has to do with
> binary math and the fact that computers deal in bytes vs.
> bits.  2^10 = 1024, which is divisibly by 8 (whereas 1,000
> would not be).  It would be very inconvenient for a computer to
> have to deal with information blocks that are not divisible by
> 8.  Modern communications systems are not byte-aligned at all
> and deal strictly in bits.  For example, a DS0 is 64kbps. 
> That's 64,000bps.
> 
> As a side note, and I'm not sure that there's any official
> convention to go along with this, in general, a KiloByte is
> abbreviated KB, with a capital K.  kilobits per second is
> generally abbreviated kbps, with a lower-case k.  Thus, when
> you see a capital K, it's safe to assume 1024 is being implied,
> whereas when you see a lower-case k, it's safe to assume 1,000
> is being implied.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > ""Robert Perez""  a icrit dans le
> > message de
> > news: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Anyone know how the conversion techniques for converting
> > bits, bytes,
> > > kilobits, etc, to calculate bandwidth usages?
> > 
> > 
> 
> 




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65102&t=65008
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to